Skip to main content
The International Money Market, Dec 14 2011,
by Investopedia Contributors by Brian Twomey
The International Monetary Market (IMM) was introduced in December 1971 and formally implemented in May 1972, although its roots can be traced to the end of Bretton Woods through the 1971 Smithsonian Agreement and Nixon's suspension of U.S. dollar's convertibility to gold.

The IMM Exchange was formed as a separate division of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and as of 2009, was the second largest futures exchange in the world. The primary purpose of the IMM is to trade currency futures, a relatively new product previously studied by academics as a way to open a freely traded exchange market to facilitate trade among nations.

The first futures experimental contracts included trades against the U.S. dollar such as the British pound, Swiss franc, German deutschmark, Canadian dollar, Japanese yen and in September 1974, the French franc. This list would later expand to include the Australian dollar, the euro, emerging market currencies such as the Russian ruble, Brazilian real, Turkish lira, Hungarian forint, Polish zloty, Mexican peso and South African rand. In 1992, the German deutschmark/Japanese yen pair was introduced as the first futures cross rate currency. But these early successes didn't come without a price.
The Drawbacks of Currency Futures

The challenging aspects were how to connect values of IMM foreign exchange contracts to the interbank market - the dominant means of currency trading in the 1970s - and how to allow the IMM to be the free-floating exchange envisioned by academics. Clearing member firms were incorporated to act as arbitrageurs between banks and the IMM to facilitate orderly markets between bid and ask spreads. The Continental Bank of Chicago was later hired as a delivery agent for contracts. These successes bred an unforeseen level of competition for new futures products.

The Chicago Board Options Exchange competed and received the right to trade U.S. 30-year bond futures while the IMM secured the right to trade eurodollar contracts, a 90 day interest rate contract settled in cash rather than physical delivery. Eurodollars came to be known as the "eurocurrency market," which is used mainly by the Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which always required payment for oil in U.S. dollars. This cash settlement aspect would later pave the way for index futures such as world stock market indexes and the IMM Index. Cash settlement would also allow the IMM to later become known as a "cash market" because of its trade in short-term, interest rate sensitive instruments.
A System for Transactions

With new competition, a transaction system was desperately needed. The CME and Reuters Holdings created the Post Market Trade (PMT) to allow a global electronic automated transaction system to act as a single clearing entity and link the world's financial centers like Tokyo and London. Today, PMT is known as Globex, which facilitates not only clearing but electronic trading for traders around the world. In 1975, U.S. T-bills were born and began trading on the IMM in January 1976. T-bill futures began trading in April 1986 with approval from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission.
The Rise of the Forex Market

The real success would come in the mid 1980s when options began trading on currency futures. By 2003, foreign exchange trading had hit a notional value of $347.5 billion.

The 1990s were a period of explosive growth for the IMM due to three world events:

Basel I in July 1988

The 12 nation European Central Bank governors agreed to standardize guidelines for banks. Bank capital had to be equal to 4% of assets.

1992 Single European Act

This not only allowed capital to flow freely throughout national borders but also allowed all banks to incorporate in any EU nation.

Basel II

This is geared to control risk by preventing losses, the realization of which is still a work in progress.

A bank's role is to channel funds from depositors to borrowers. With these news acts, depositors could be governments, governmental agencies and multinational corporations. The role for banks in this new international arena exploded in order to meet the demands of financing capital requirements, new loan structures and new interest rate structures such as overnight lending rates; increasingly, IMM was used for all finance needs.

Plus, a whole host of new trading instruments was introduced such as money market swaps to lock in or reduce borrowing costs, and swaps for arbitrage against futures or hedge risk. Currency swaps would not be introduced until the the 2000s.
Financial Crises and Liquidity

In financial crisis situations, central bankers must provide liquidity to stabilize markets because risk may trade at premiums to a bank's target rates, called money rates, that central bankers can't control. Central bankers then provide liquidity to banks that trade and control rates. These are called repo rates, and they are traded through the IMM. Repo markets allow participants to undertake rapid refinancing in the interbank market independent of credit limits to stabilize the system. A borrower pledges securitized assets such as stocks in exchange for cash to allow its operations to continue.
Asian Money Markets and the IMM

Asian money markets linked up with the IMM because Asian governments, banks and businesses needed to facilitate business and trade in a faster way rather than borrowing U.S. dollar deposits from European banks. Asian banks, like European banks, were saddled with dollar-denominated deposits because all trades were dollar-denominated as a result of the U.S. dollar's dominance. So, extra trades were needed to facilitate trade in other currencies, particularly euros. Asia and the E.U. would go on to share not only an explosion of trade but also two of the most widely traded world currencies on the IMM. For this reason, the Japanese yen is quoted in U.S. dollars, while eurodollar futures are quoted based on the IMM Index, a function of the three-month LIBOR.

The IMM Index base of 100 is subtracted from the three-month LIBOR to ensure that bid prices are below the ask price. These are normal procedures used in other widely traded instruments on the IMM to insure market stabilization.
Final Notes

As of June 2000, the IMM switched from a nonprofit to a profit, membership and shareholder-owned entity. It opens for trading at 8:20 Eastern Time to reflect major U.S. economic releases reported at 8:30am. Banks, central bankers, multinational corporations, traders, speculators and other institutions all use its various products to borrow, lend, trade, profit, finance, speculate and hedge risks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

購屋糾紛多 預售屋是申訴榜首行政院消費者保護委員會統計,房屋糾紛為去年國人所有申訴糾紛排行榜第一名,3030件糾紛案已佔所有申訴糾紛一成,其中尤以「預售屋」糾紛最為嚴重。發現六大缺失,包括:建商未提供驗收條款或未記載交屋保留款、未明確記載開工日期及取得使用執照期限、未記載地價稅、房屋稅分擔比例、未經買方同意更換主要建材及廠牌規格及交屋期限不明確、未記載建物第一次登記的稅費負擔約定,以及未記載賣方對廣告之義務而且違約金收取過高。 消保官莊惠媛指出,消費者購買預售屋基本上就像購買一個夢想,且大部分消費者必須要花掉一生積蓄才能買回一個窩,但因為預售屋不像成屋,有實體房屋可供檢視,就得預先和房屋業者訂契約先行付款,最後往往因期待有落差而陷入糾紛成為惱人之痛。 莊惠媛呼籲,民眾購屋前為了維護權益,應先瞭解內政部先前訂定的「預售屋買賣契約書範本及預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項」,尤其針對預售屋挑購提出「八大提醒」,包括:一、確認並履勘預售屋位址;二、攜帶捲尺、相機參觀樣品屋;三、看建築執照影本、執照核准圖說;四、審閱契約並瞭解契約內容;五、索取並保留廣告文案;六、詳實紀錄銷售現場建材資訊;七、洞悉成交紅單、假客戶等銷售手法;八、選擇合法代銷業者,以免受騙上當。 【2009/03/16 聯合晚報】
科技擠壓 原生種子快滅絕 2009/05/15【米千因/文】《聖經‧創世紀》:上帝說:我要將所造的人和走獸並昆蟲以及空中的飛鳥都從地上消滅。 於是上帝在罪惡滿貫的人類中揀選恪守本分的義人諾亞一家,諾亞夫婦、三個兒子及其媳婦,作為新一代人類種子來保存下來。上帝告訴他們,七天之後就要實施大毀滅,而命他們造一只方舟,一間一間地造,裡外抹上松香。諾亞一家立即照辦,等方舟造好之後,上帝說了:看哪!我要使洪水在地上氾濫,毀滅天下,凡地上有血肉、有氣息的活物無一不死。我卻要與你立約,你同你的妻子、兒子、兒媳都要進入方舟。凡潔淨的畜類,你要帶七公七母;不潔淨的畜類,你要帶一公一母;空中的飛鳥也要帶七公七母。這些都可以留種,將來在地上生殖。2月17日當天,諾亞六百歲生辰,海洋裂開,巨大的水柱從地下噴射而出,大雨下不停,整整降了四十天,水無處可流,迅速上漲,淹沒了高山,最後凡是在陸地上靠肺呼吸的動物都死了,只剩下方舟上的人、動物及種子安然無恙。 目前有一群歷史學家與考古學家正在熱衷地尋找證據,來證明諾亞方舟的存在,而部分社會學家與環保人士卻將關注的眼光投向原生種子的培育與保留上。理由是工業革命以至基改科技發達的今日,原生植物種子滅絕了大半而不復得。比方,世界上原有二百多萬種食用性植物,稻米種類至少也有十二萬種之多,如今普遍種植的不到數百種。十九世紀,美洲大陸至少有七千多種不同種類的蘋果,現在則僅剩約三百種,且大都是雜交,原生種如鳳毛麟角;加上企業一手主宰的廣大單作,以及隨後而至的基改技術,雜食性的人類於是被迫成為挑食、偏食、速食的怪物。而糧食分配不均的問題不但未能因而獲得解決,甚且因企業的壟斷而更形惡化。雖有科技的介入而全球饑餓人口不減反增,糧食價格高漲不下,人類身心健康因飲食習慣的改變而為過胖、糖尿病、心臟病、憂鬱症等文明病所苦。人類以科技萬能的傲慢插手上帝的傑作導致這樣的結果,不待歷史學家及考古學家的證明,全球暖化將引發大洪水的理論或會成為事實,那麼,一個有效而力量龐大的逆轉運動若非於此時出現,人難道只能坐以待斃? 義大利人Carlo Petrini首先發難,組成了國際慢食會,且一觸即發,如洪水漫過大地地延燒成一股運動,沒幾年,慢食所講求的良好、公平、乾淨的主旨與精神傳染了全球各角落,因而衍生出林林種種反應在慢活態度的活動與主張,於是慢食之後,慢活、慢設計、慢診斷、慢建築、慢手工、...

司法部要細究微軟/Yahoo搜尋交易

為何美司法部要細究微軟/Yahoo搜尋交易? ZDNET新聞專區:2009/09/14 微軟與Yahoo的搜尋交易,不但實行之日遙遙無期,現在更可能無疾而終。 兩家公司都預期美國聯邦司法部會詳細審查微軟接手Yahoo網搜業務的交易,而兩家公司也在上週五(11日)證實,司法部已要求他們提供更多相關資訊。這代表主管機關對此案的興趣已不只是一般程序的合法性。 針對此案,司法部可能從兩個不同的面向切入。其一,當局將調查廣告主是否因失去一個廣告通路而受損,以及此後Google會否在搜尋市場缺乏改善的動力,因為少了一個最大的競爭者。 就某些方面而言,司法部的調查幾乎是一項反射動作。紐約Constantine Cannon反托辣斯律師Matthew Cantor表示,當某個市場只有三家主要公司,而其中兩家決定合作,自然會引發調查。他說:「這件交易將在一個高門檻,且原本只有三個主角的市場,消滅其中一個競爭者。」他用1960年代的美國媒體市場為例,假如當時僅有的三大電視網有其中兩家決定合併,政府絕對會採取行動。 但這件醞釀多年的交易,卻沒有趕在較不排斥企業併購和收購的前朝政府任內提出。華盛頓州Robbin Russell事務所合夥人Donald Russell指出,經過多年的放任管理,司法部對企業併購活動的興趣又逐漸升高。經濟狀況不佳已減少了企業併購活動,但歐巴馬總統主政之下的司法部,可能開始扮演更強勢的管理角色。 Cantor認為,司法部將強迫微軟和 Yahoo將Yahoo的搜尋技術資產公開標售,換取該案通過。此舉將可引進第三方到搜尋市場,僅管這個新手必須挑起吸引搜尋者的重擔:Yahoo曾表示,絕大部分Yahoo搜尋的使用者,都是透過某個Yahoo網頁進行,這兩者的結合,是網路上流量最高的網頁。然而,微軟看上的不是這部分。該公司已投入龐大的資源推出Bing搜尋引擎,他們想要的是Yahoo搜尋技術的特定面向,更別說某些才華洋溢的工程師。 有鑑於微軟和Google兩大巨人多年來在華府的遊說角力,造成Google近年的交易飽受刁難,這次也可能是Google趁機扳回一城。Google拒絕評論司法部的動作,但有以下聲明:「線上(市場)的競爭一向激烈,而我們的經驗是,競爭為使用者造就了更好的東西。我們有意進一步瞭解這件交易。」(陳智文/譯)