Skip to main content

Madoff reduced to nothing

Government seizes all assets from Ponzi mastermind, who faces maximum of 150 years in prison at his sentencing Monday. Wife loses millions in assets.
June 27, 2009: 12:22 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Bernard and Ruth Madoff have been stripped of their vast riches.

The government announced Friday night that it had seized all of Bernard Madoff's property in a deal that also forces his wife to give up homes and property worth millions.

Federal prosecutors obtained a $170 billion legal judgment against Madoff.

Madoff, 71, masterminded the largest and most sweeping Ponzi scheme ever, and now faces the possibility of spending the rest of his natural life in prison.

Madoff is scheduled to be sentenced on Monday morning in a federal court in Manhattan.

On Friday, prosecutors urged U.S. District Judge Denny Chin to hand out the full possible sentence of 150 years. Earlier in the week, Madoff argued in court papers that he should be sentenced to a term of as little as 12 years.

The court papers released Friday night indicate that Bernard and Ruth Madoff will give up any claim on nearly $80 million worth of property.

These include $60 million and three homes: A Manhattan apartment valued at $7.5 million, a $7 million house in Montauk, N.Y., and a $7.45 million home in Palm Beach, Fla.

In addition, the government will get $1.48 million from the sale of a Madoff home in Cap d'Antibes, France, as well as furniture, artwork, jewelry other items. The Madoffs will also lose their interest in "tens of millions of dollars" in loans they had made to family, employees and friends.

Madoff confessed on March 12 to a scam that stole billions of dollars from thousands of victims. He used his investment firm, Bernard L. Madoff Securities, which he founded in 1960, as a front.

In a Ponzi scheme, the scammer uses fresh money from unsuspecting investors to make payments to more mature investors, creating the false appearance of legitimate returns. In Madoff's case, he sent statements to victims claiming that their investments had grown several times over, but in actuality he had stolen, not invested, their money.

Investigators said that Madoff maintained an aura of exclusivity, while his alleged accomplices courted new investors because they needed a constant influx of fresh funds. Investigators believe that Madoff had been running his scam since at least the 1980s until he finally ran out of money in December 2008, when he admitted the fraud to family members.
Sentence: 150 years, or 12?

Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts, including fraud, money laundering, perjury, false filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other crimes. Prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney's office in New York requested the maximum sentence of 150 years, based on the number of victims, the amount of money he stole and the extent of the damage he caused.
0:00 /4:18Inside Bernie's house of cards

Many of his victims were wiped out financially by the scam and they have sent letters to the judge requesting a life sentence.

But Madoff's lawyer Ira Lee Sorkin requested a 12-year sentence. Sorkin explained, in his letter to the judge, that his septuagenarian client isn't likely to outlive the sentence by more than a year.

"Mr. Madoff is currently 71 years old and has an approximate life expectancy of 13 years," wrote Sorkin. "A prison term of 12 years -- just short of an effective life sentence -- will sufficiently address the goals of deterrence, protecting the public and promoting respect for the law."

In his letter, Sorkin described Madoff as "non-violent," noted his "voluntary surrender" to authorities and complained about the "desire for a type of mob vengeance" in the victims' impact letters.
Compensating the victims

Thus far, federal investigators have identified 1,341 investors in Madoff's firm, with losses exceeding $13 billion. They're still tallying the damage.

A group of victims sent the judge a 141-page collection of letters detailing the extent of damage that Madoff had inflicted on them. Many of the victims said they had banked their life savings with Madoff's firm and they were ruined as a result of his scam.

Eleven of the letter-writers requested, and were granted, the right to speak in court on Monday.

There are two ways for victims to get compensated, or at least partially compensated, for their losses: through seized assets and through the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, an organization that shields investors in brokerage firms.

Many of the Madoffs' other assets have been seized as well, including a home in Palm Beach, Fla., an $800,000 yacht named The Bull, and a legitimate investment firm that Madoff kept separate from the scheme. The value of these and other assets will eventually be used to compensate victims, based on how much they invested in Madoff's firm.

Also, SIPC will pay up to $500,000 for any eligible claimant who lost money to Madoff, based on how much they put in. This coverage comes from dues paid by brokerage firms.

Some victims are unhappy with this system. Joe Stewart of Las Vegas explained, in a written statement to CNNMoney.com, that as an indirect investor he is not covered by SIPC. Another victim, Dana Foy of Jemez, N.M., complained that SIPC will only compensate him for the $150,000 he invested in the firm, not the $600,000 that the firm told him his investments were worth.

"In any other Ponzi scheme, the rule is [that] cash in, minus the cash [that the investor took] out, is going to be the value of your claim," said SIPC Chief Executive Steve Harbeck to CNNMoney.com.

Harbeck said that indirect investors who unknowingly gave their money to Madoff through a separate firm aren't necessarily barred from compensation, depending on their particular case. "There are very few things in law that are black and white," he said.

Harbeck said that victims have until July 2 to file a claim with U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York.
Madoff's next home

For three months since his December arrest, Madoff managed to avoid jail by posting $10 million worth of bail. He spent the time under house arrest, ensconced in his Manhattan apartment.

But since his confession in March, he has been incarcerated in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan, a holding facility for convicts awaiting sentencing. This has given him a taste of life behind bars.

Once he is sentenced, he will probably be transferred to a medium-security federal prison, according to prison consultants. Madoff's status as a non-violent offender should keep him out of maximum-security, consultants said. But they added that the massive scale of his crimes and his hefty sentence would make him ineligible for a low-security prison or a minimum-security prison camp, which inmates usually prefer because of safety, fewer restrictions and better quality of life.

In a medium-security prison, he would live in a cell, separated from the outer world by double layers of razor wire fencing with electronic detection systems, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. He would have to work a menial job, possibly in a kitchen or laundry room, for 12 to 40 cents an hour.

The BOP will have the final say as to where Madoff will serve his sentence. BOP spokeswoman Felicia Ponce said they try to place inmates within 500 miles of their families.

Keeping that in mind, Alan Ellis, attorney and author of the "Federal Prison Guidebook," believes that Madoff will probably get sent to Federal Correctional Institute Otisville or FCI Ray Brook, both in upstate New York, FCI Fairton in New Jersey or FCI McKean in Pennsylvania.

Madoff will have to learn how to survive in the medium-security environment, where there are many violent offenders, according to prison consultants.

"There will be people who think that Bernie can give them stock tips, but I don't see anyone being his big pal," said Larry Levine, founder of Wall Street Prison Consultants who served 10 years for his ties to organized crime. "I believe he'll be treated like an outcast." To top of page

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

工程排水量設計 與 暴雨量

  獨家/直擊大巨蛋落下「瀑布」 民眾疑惑問:排水系統呢? 14:35 2021/06/04   中時   張穎齊 中央氣象局發布豪大雨特報,有民眾直擊拍下大巨蛋從「蛋頂」沖下的瀑布影片,疑惑直呼「排水系統呢?」。(民眾提供/張穎齊台北傳真) 木柵路2段109巷口淹水。(北市府提供/張穎齊台北傳真) 南湖大橋下淹水。(北市府提供/張穎齊台北傳真) 北市消防局門口淹水。(北市府提供/張穎齊台北傳真) 六張犁信安街淹水。(北市府提供/張穎齊台北傳真) 中央氣象局發布豪大雨特報,受颱風及鋒面接近影響,北市中午12時起開始有持續性的強對流發展,市中心有瞬間強降雨,文山、大安及信義區時雨量均超過100毫米,大安及信義區最大10分鐘雨量均超過30毫米,多處積淹水。不過也有民眾直擊拍下大巨蛋從「蛋頂」沖下的瀑布影片,疑惑直呼「排水系統呢?」 北市府表示,目前測得最大累積雨量為大安區福州山站127.5毫米,水利署已發布南港區淹水一級警戒及松山區一級警戒,水利處稍早通知南港區南深陸閘門因為逼近警戒水位,可能隨時關閉。 此外,水利處也已通知各區里,因目前瞬間強降雨遠大於下水道的容量,會有積水狀況發生,如有地下室的應盡速關上防水閘門,減少積水進入地下室造成損失。而木柵路2段109巷口淹水,深約20公分,範圍約100平方公尺,南湖大橋下淹水長度約50公尺、寬度約10尺、深度約50公分。

拆除案 與都更案類似之場景 溝通或方案可能不足

緊急喊停!拆南鐵最後1戶踢鐵板 雙方對峙1小時 鐵道局:今拆除取消 07:42 2020/07/23   中時   鐵道局中工處主任工程司吳志仁宣布今天拆除喊卡。(曹婷婷攝) 字級設定: 小 中 大 特 影》緊急喊卡!拆南鐵最後一戶 雙方對峙1小時 鐵道局今不拆了! 拒拆遷戶陳致曉家門外一度聚集大批警力。(曹婷婷攝) 反對拆遷抗爭者守在大門內。(曹婷婷攝) 警方在7點多撤離,鐵道局隨後宣布取消今天拆除行動。(曹婷婷攝) 台南鐵路地下化強拆作業預計今天清晨6時拆除最後一棟拒拆遷戶、青年路陳致曉家,交通部鐵道局中工處人員和大批警力6點一到在陳宅外宣讀拆除程序於法有據,屋內上百人不斷高呼「反東移、反對徵收」口號,雙方對峙1個多小時後,鐵道局中工處7點20分宣布基於避免衍生衝突,衍生社會成本,今天拆除計畫決定取消。 交通部鐵道局中部工程處主任工程司吳志仁7點20分出面宣布,南鐵地下化是台南重大計畫,但因為考量陳宅有許多人,基於避免造成衝突及衍生不必要社會成本,決定取消。他強調,因全案只剩陳宅拒拆,接下來會傳持續跟陳致曉溝通。 針對鐵道局宣布暫緩任務,陳致曉表示,將討論戰術,「但我不會因此開心,因為今天不攻,明天、後天也會來。」並回嗆「他來我就打!」 反南鐵東移拒拆 自救會長嗆:「歡迎攻進來」 07:12 2020/07/23   中時   反南鐵東移聲援民眾守在待拆戶家中,不願撤離。(李宜杰攝) Facebook   Messenger   Line   Weibo   Twitter   Telegram   複製連結 字級設定: 小 中 大 特 警民仍持續對峙中,鐵道局也釋出善意要溝通。(李宜杰攝) 配合南鐵地下化工程,鐵道局中工處預計今日(23)清晨6時拆除東區青年路陳家。目前反南鐵東移全線自救會長陳致曉與雙親,及超過百名聲援民眾守在陳家客廳,手拉手拒絕撤退,警方及鐵道局人員被拒於門外,並提出要與陳致曉溝通,陳致曉則回嗆「絕不會交涉,歡迎攻進來!」 據悉,目前怪手已進駐陳家後院,百名警力、消防車、救護車也都部署完畢,衝突一觸即發,聲援民眾痛斥「行政訴訟還在打,不要當政黨打

司法改革心

中時社論》司法改革 制度要改心更要改 2017/6/11 下午  司法改革國是會議第1分組第4次增開會議在司法院開會。(黄世麒攝) 司法改革國是會議5個分組分別進行了3個月的會議,已全部結束。5個分組各自提出數十件改革提議,總量非常可觀,多項分組決議曾引起社會高度爭議,且司法院、法務部、律師團體間顯然有嚴重的價值觀與職務立場衝突,接下來幕僚人員如何進行議題綜整,全體會議如何達成總結性結論,事關改革成敗與國家民主發展,身為媒體必須關注,並適時對社會發出建言與警語。 分組討論議題牽涉甚廣,從金字塔式的訴訟制度、賦予大法官違憲裁判審查權、保障司法程序弱勢方權利、修復式司法法制化,到研究設立商業法院、特別勞動訴訟程序、稅務法庭,到高度政治性的增訂妨害司法公正罪,以切斷政治干擾司法的可能性。此外,還包括調整法官晉用制度、終審法院行公開言詞辯論、研議法庭直播提高司法透明度,及檢察體系的性格定位、刑事訴訟程序從起訴的方法開始改變,到改善判決文書格式以求易懂等。 司法的重要性,這裡就不必再行強調。司法的社會公信力嚴重不足,到達需要召開司法改革國是會議來開藥方治病的地步,本身就令人痛心疾首。其實司法改革大業,一方面固然有制度上需要調整的地方,另一方面也有司法人員行為、文化必須大幅檢討改進之處。改革制度需要協調立法、行政、司法甚至考試諸院配合行事,但相對司法相關人員的「革心」,還是比較容易,人的行為與文化改變更困難。台灣民主體制下司法獨立,不受行政及政治干預,為了追求司法獨立的提升而改變司法人員的行為與文化,尤其困難。 改變司法人員的行為與文化具有先天性的困難,在這次司改會議過程中已一覽無遺。這次會議特別引進了半數不具法律背景的委員參與討論,其實就是希望避免法界人士研議司法改革時,閉門造車、諱疾忌醫,甚至護短,成為改革的障礙,但諱疾忌醫甚至護短的毛病仍然不時出現,雖不令人意外,但仍然對會議的進行與成果形成負面的影響。法界人士包括官員、教授、司法從業人士,因為諱疾忌醫甚至護短而在媒體上攻訐,不惜傷害司改會議的社會形象,令人感到遺憾。 諱疾忌醫甚至護短的現象,從議題處理方式的輕重選擇,也可看得出來。關說司法,特別是政治人物包括民意代表關說司法,問題普遍而且觀念嚴重偏頗的程度,從前立法院長王金平加上前檢察總長黃世銘的訴訟案件中,就足以一覽無遺。政