Skip to main content

Madoff reduced to nothing

Government seizes all assets from Ponzi mastermind, who faces maximum of 150 years in prison at his sentencing Monday. Wife loses millions in assets.
June 27, 2009: 12:22 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Bernard and Ruth Madoff have been stripped of their vast riches.

The government announced Friday night that it had seized all of Bernard Madoff's property in a deal that also forces his wife to give up homes and property worth millions.

Federal prosecutors obtained a $170 billion legal judgment against Madoff.

Madoff, 71, masterminded the largest and most sweeping Ponzi scheme ever, and now faces the possibility of spending the rest of his natural life in prison.

Madoff is scheduled to be sentenced on Monday morning in a federal court in Manhattan.

On Friday, prosecutors urged U.S. District Judge Denny Chin to hand out the full possible sentence of 150 years. Earlier in the week, Madoff argued in court papers that he should be sentenced to a term of as little as 12 years.

The court papers released Friday night indicate that Bernard and Ruth Madoff will give up any claim on nearly $80 million worth of property.

These include $60 million and three homes: A Manhattan apartment valued at $7.5 million, a $7 million house in Montauk, N.Y., and a $7.45 million home in Palm Beach, Fla.

In addition, the government will get $1.48 million from the sale of a Madoff home in Cap d'Antibes, France, as well as furniture, artwork, jewelry other items. The Madoffs will also lose their interest in "tens of millions of dollars" in loans they had made to family, employees and friends.

Madoff confessed on March 12 to a scam that stole billions of dollars from thousands of victims. He used his investment firm, Bernard L. Madoff Securities, which he founded in 1960, as a front.

In a Ponzi scheme, the scammer uses fresh money from unsuspecting investors to make payments to more mature investors, creating the false appearance of legitimate returns. In Madoff's case, he sent statements to victims claiming that their investments had grown several times over, but in actuality he had stolen, not invested, their money.

Investigators said that Madoff maintained an aura of exclusivity, while his alleged accomplices courted new investors because they needed a constant influx of fresh funds. Investigators believe that Madoff had been running his scam since at least the 1980s until he finally ran out of money in December 2008, when he admitted the fraud to family members.
Sentence: 150 years, or 12?

Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts, including fraud, money laundering, perjury, false filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other crimes. Prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney's office in New York requested the maximum sentence of 150 years, based on the number of victims, the amount of money he stole and the extent of the damage he caused.
0:00 /4:18Inside Bernie's house of cards

Many of his victims were wiped out financially by the scam and they have sent letters to the judge requesting a life sentence.

But Madoff's lawyer Ira Lee Sorkin requested a 12-year sentence. Sorkin explained, in his letter to the judge, that his septuagenarian client isn't likely to outlive the sentence by more than a year.

"Mr. Madoff is currently 71 years old and has an approximate life expectancy of 13 years," wrote Sorkin. "A prison term of 12 years -- just short of an effective life sentence -- will sufficiently address the goals of deterrence, protecting the public and promoting respect for the law."

In his letter, Sorkin described Madoff as "non-violent," noted his "voluntary surrender" to authorities and complained about the "desire for a type of mob vengeance" in the victims' impact letters.
Compensating the victims

Thus far, federal investigators have identified 1,341 investors in Madoff's firm, with losses exceeding $13 billion. They're still tallying the damage.

A group of victims sent the judge a 141-page collection of letters detailing the extent of damage that Madoff had inflicted on them. Many of the victims said they had banked their life savings with Madoff's firm and they were ruined as a result of his scam.

Eleven of the letter-writers requested, and were granted, the right to speak in court on Monday.

There are two ways for victims to get compensated, or at least partially compensated, for their losses: through seized assets and through the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, an organization that shields investors in brokerage firms.

Many of the Madoffs' other assets have been seized as well, including a home in Palm Beach, Fla., an $800,000 yacht named The Bull, and a legitimate investment firm that Madoff kept separate from the scheme. The value of these and other assets will eventually be used to compensate victims, based on how much they invested in Madoff's firm.

Also, SIPC will pay up to $500,000 for any eligible claimant who lost money to Madoff, based on how much they put in. This coverage comes from dues paid by brokerage firms.

Some victims are unhappy with this system. Joe Stewart of Las Vegas explained, in a written statement to CNNMoney.com, that as an indirect investor he is not covered by SIPC. Another victim, Dana Foy of Jemez, N.M., complained that SIPC will only compensate him for the $150,000 he invested in the firm, not the $600,000 that the firm told him his investments were worth.

"In any other Ponzi scheme, the rule is [that] cash in, minus the cash [that the investor took] out, is going to be the value of your claim," said SIPC Chief Executive Steve Harbeck to CNNMoney.com.

Harbeck said that indirect investors who unknowingly gave their money to Madoff through a separate firm aren't necessarily barred from compensation, depending on their particular case. "There are very few things in law that are black and white," he said.

Harbeck said that victims have until July 2 to file a claim with U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York.
Madoff's next home

For three months since his December arrest, Madoff managed to avoid jail by posting $10 million worth of bail. He spent the time under house arrest, ensconced in his Manhattan apartment.

But since his confession in March, he has been incarcerated in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan, a holding facility for convicts awaiting sentencing. This has given him a taste of life behind bars.

Once he is sentenced, he will probably be transferred to a medium-security federal prison, according to prison consultants. Madoff's status as a non-violent offender should keep him out of maximum-security, consultants said. But they added that the massive scale of his crimes and his hefty sentence would make him ineligible for a low-security prison or a minimum-security prison camp, which inmates usually prefer because of safety, fewer restrictions and better quality of life.

In a medium-security prison, he would live in a cell, separated from the outer world by double layers of razor wire fencing with electronic detection systems, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. He would have to work a menial job, possibly in a kitchen or laundry room, for 12 to 40 cents an hour.

The BOP will have the final say as to where Madoff will serve his sentence. BOP spokeswoman Felicia Ponce said they try to place inmates within 500 miles of their families.

Keeping that in mind, Alan Ellis, attorney and author of the "Federal Prison Guidebook," believes that Madoff will probably get sent to Federal Correctional Institute Otisville or FCI Ray Brook, both in upstate New York, FCI Fairton in New Jersey or FCI McKean in Pennsylvania.

Madoff will have to learn how to survive in the medium-security environment, where there are many violent offenders, according to prison consultants.

"There will be people who think that Bernie can give them stock tips, but I don't see anyone being his big pal," said Larry Levine, founder of Wall Street Prison Consultants who served 10 years for his ties to organized crime. "I believe he'll be treated like an outcast." To top of page

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

購屋糾紛多 預售屋是申訴榜首行政院消費者保護委員會統計,房屋糾紛為去年國人所有申訴糾紛排行榜第一名,3030件糾紛案已佔所有申訴糾紛一成,其中尤以「預售屋」糾紛最為嚴重。發現六大缺失,包括:建商未提供驗收條款或未記載交屋保留款、未明確記載開工日期及取得使用執照期限、未記載地價稅、房屋稅分擔比例、未經買方同意更換主要建材及廠牌規格及交屋期限不明確、未記載建物第一次登記的稅費負擔約定,以及未記載賣方對廣告之義務而且違約金收取過高。 消保官莊惠媛指出,消費者購買預售屋基本上就像購買一個夢想,且大部分消費者必須要花掉一生積蓄才能買回一個窩,但因為預售屋不像成屋,有實體房屋可供檢視,就得預先和房屋業者訂契約先行付款,最後往往因期待有落差而陷入糾紛成為惱人之痛。 莊惠媛呼籲,民眾購屋前為了維護權益,應先瞭解內政部先前訂定的「預售屋買賣契約書範本及預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項」,尤其針對預售屋挑購提出「八大提醒」,包括:一、確認並履勘預售屋位址;二、攜帶捲尺、相機參觀樣品屋;三、看建築執照影本、執照核准圖說;四、審閱契約並瞭解契約內容;五、索取並保留廣告文案;六、詳實紀錄銷售現場建材資訊;七、洞悉成交紅單、假客戶等銷售手法;八、選擇合法代銷業者,以免受騙上當。 【2009/03/16 聯合晚報】
Pirates cost software industry $50 billion in 2008 Washington, DC - A fifth of PC software in the United States is pirated and the worldwide cost of piracy topped $50bn for the first time, says the annual report from IDC and the Business Software Alliance (BSA). Despite US piracy running at just 20%, market size means megabuck losses - over $9 billion in 2008. The worldwide PC software piracy rate rose for the second year in a row, from 38 percent to 41 percent, because PC shipments grew fastest in high-piracy countries such as China and India, overwhelming progress elsewhere. While emerging economies account for 45 percent of the global PC hardware market, they account for less than 20 percent of the PC software market. If the emerging economies' PC software share were the same as it is for PC hardware, the software market would grow by $40 billion a year. Lowering global piracy by just one point a year would add $20 billion in stimulus to the IT industry, says the report. The mo...
歐債危機 都是單一貨幣害的【經濟日報╱2012.02.28 03:06 am萄葡牙的局面非常嚴重,因為失業率已經超過13%。希臘、愛爾蘭甚至西班牙的情況更糟。整個歐洲似乎已經再度陷入衰退。 為什麼歐洲已經淪為全球經濟的病夫?答案似乎人盡皆知,遺憾的是人們知道的大多不是實情,而有關歐洲問題的不實說法正在扭曲我們的經濟討論。 試閱讀有關歐洲問題的討論文章,或者一篇看似符合事實的報導,則會看到兩種說法中的一種。我暫且稱之為共和黨人與德國的敘述。兩者均與事實不符。 共和黨的說法是羅姆尼競選的主軸之一。這種說法聲稱,歐洲因為對窮人伸援太多而麻煩上身;這是福利國死前的掙扎。這是右派陣營始終偏好的論點之一。1991年,瑞典因為放寬管制而面臨金融危機(似曾相識吧?)時,卡托研究所發表一項報告,聲稱這足以證明整個福利國模式行不通。 然而,仍然保留福利國制度的瑞典目前表現亮眼,經濟成長優於其他富裕國家。 我們不妨有系統評論,逐一檢視目前使用歐元的15個歐洲國家(排除馬爾他與塞浦路斯),並根據危機出現前,各國用於各種社會施政方案的預算占GDP之比予以排名。希臘、愛爾蘭、葡葡牙、西班牙、義大利是否因為福利制度過於細緻而顯得與眾不同?沒有。只有義大利可列入前五名,即使如此,它的福利制度規模仍不及德國。 換言之,龐大的福利制度並不是問題的肇因。 接下來談德國的論述,亦即把問題主要歸咎於財政不負責任。這種論調似乎與希臘的情況相符,而且也僅止於此。義大利在危機發生前數年即已出現赤字,規模卻僅略大於德國(義大利的龐大赤字主要源自多年前不負責任的政策)。葡萄牙的赤字小很多,西班牙與愛爾蘭則享有盈餘。 噢,還有。部分不是歐元國的國家似乎也能夠在未面臨任何危機的情況下,揹負龐大的赤字與債務。英國與美國可以大約2%的低利率長期舉債;日本揹負的債務遠大於含希臘在內的任何歐洲國家,利率只有1%。 換言之,「希臘化」的經濟論辯毫無事實根據。 如此說來,歐洲的問題究竟何在?真相是,問題大多與貨幣有關。歐洲國家推出單一貨幣,卻缺少確保該貨幣運作無礙所需的配套機構,無形中等於再次創造金本位制的缺失。這些缺點曾經在大蕭條形成的過程中扮演重要角色。 更確切的說,歐元使民間投資人產生虛假的安全感,並導致資金大舉湧向歐洲各邊緣國,相對又導致成本與價格大漲,製造業失去競爭力,1999年貿易大致平衡的各國並開始出現龐大的貿易赤字。...